On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 4:28 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 11:00:20PM +0300, Ekaterina Kiryanova wrote: > > > Another point worth mentioning is that only this file contains the phrase > > "two-phase transaction". I believe that "two-phase commit transaction" or > > "transaction prepared for two-phase commit" depending on the situation would > > be better wording. > > "Prepare for two-phase commit" may be clearer? >
I think we can use just "Prepared transaction" instead. So, the message "The user defined GID of the two-phase transaction." can be changed to "The user defined GID of the prepared transaction.". Similarly, the message "Identifies the message as a two-phase prepared transaction message." could be changed to: "Identifies the message as a prepared transaction message." > > And finally, could you please clarify this part? > > -- The end LSN of the prepare transaction. > > Is it a typo of "prepared transaction"? I think in this case it should be a "prepared transaction". Thanks for the report and Thanks Michael for including me. I am just redirecting it to -hackers so that others involved in this feature also can share their views. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
