On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 1:32 AM Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: >> Looking at the Git history, most of that paragraph is from a time >> when autovacuum did not yet exist or was much less reliable than it >> is now. So I suggest removing all that and pointing to autovacuum >> instead, as done in the attached patch. > > > Agred. A nightly vacuum is definitely not something for "most people" anymore.
+1. The VACUUM documentation needs to be totally overhauled. This is a start. -- Peter Geoghegan
