My bad, yes indeed, the view is different. На пн, 4.04.2022 г. в 17:01 ч. Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> написа:
> Kouber Saparev <kou...@gmail.com> writes: > > I believe there is an error within this sentence in section > > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/monitoring-stats.html#MONITORING-PG-STAT-USER-FUNCTIONS-VIEW > > > "Therefore, a bitmap scan increments the > > pg_stat_all_indexes.idx_tup_read count(s) > > for the index(es) it uses, and it increments the pg_stat_all_tables. > > idx_tup_fetch count for the table, but it does not affect > > pg_stat_all_indexes.idx_tup_fetch." > > > There is repeated mentioning of pg_stat_all_indexes.idx_tup_fetch while I > > suppose one should read pg_stat_all_indexes.idx_scan instead the second > > time. I.e. bitmap scans do not increment idx_scan. > > Um ... you did notice that the mentions of idx_tup_fetch apply to two > different views, pg_stat_all_tables vs pg_stat_all_indexes? > > regards, tom lane >
