On Tue, 2021-10-12 at 08:22 +0300, Pavel Luzanov wrote: > When trying to make a link to the new vacuum_multixact_failsafe_age parameter, > I found the wrong ID for this guc (missed word vacuum). > Please consider this patch for a fix.
It is good to be consistent, but the name of the link is not essential, is it? Changing it might break existing outside links. Yours, Laurenz Albe
