On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 11:12:38PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > Interesting. I see several cases where our docs are not clear we > > process only the first match: > > At least two of these changes are flat out wrong. The places > that explicitly mention "substring(s)" are not doing so because > we failed to think about what that meant.
I really don't understand the use of "(s)" except in place where we are really trying to point out the idea of one or multiple, and I don't see that being significant in these cases --- can you clarify? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.
