"David G. Johnston" <[email protected]> writes: > I did a read through of the patch and I like it; though I suggest changing > "but non-NULL" to "while non-NULL".
Done that way, thanks.
regards, tom lane
"David G. Johnston" <[email protected]> writes: > I did a read through of the patch and I like it; though I suggest changing > "but non-NULL" to "while non-NULL".
Done that way, thanks.
regards, tom lane