John Lumby wrote:
<
< Tom Lane wrote
<
< > > How about replacing "expression [ , ... ]" by "parameter_list" in the
description,
< > > and then stating that parameter_list can be either a single expression or
,
< > > if the particular aggregate function accepts it (for which, consult
that function's reference),
< > > a comma-separated list of expressions.
< >
< > That's just as wrong. As we tried to explain before, the
< > parenthesized-list syntax is a row constructor, so it only works
< > in cases where the aggregate function can accept a composite
< > argument type. Most don't.
< >
<
< But surely not *all* cases of a multi-expression parameter list of an
aggregate function are row constructors are they? What about
<
< select parent_id, name, GROUPING(parent_id , name), count(*) FROM mytable
GROUP BY ROLLUP(parent_id , name);
<
< In the piece "GROUPING(parent_id , name)" ,
< is "(parent_id , name)" a row constructor or a list of two expressions?
<
< Or are you saying those are one and the same thing?
<
I think I can answer my own question - No they are not the same - because
:
select parent_id, name, GROUPING(ROW(parent_id , name)), count(*) FROM mytable
GROUP BY ROLLUP(parent_id , name);
ERROR: arguments to GROUPING must be grouping expressions of the associated
query level
LINE 1: select parent_id, name, GROUPING(ROW(parent_id , name)), cou...
^
