On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 06:50:10PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On 2019-Nov-07, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 07:55:22PM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > > > > On 7 Nov 2019, at 16:03, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > We could say "empty", which seems better suited than both "virgin" and > > > > "pristine" anyway. > > > > > > empty is a lot better, but still isn't conveying the state of the database > > > without there being room for interpretation. (My grasp of the english > > > language > > > isn't enough to suggest a better alternative however). > > > > I am thinking "pristine" would be a good word here. > > But you would have to explain that a database created as a copy of > template1 may somehow not be pristine. Maybe we should just use a > phrase that describes what we mean, something like "a database that > doesn't contain objects other than default system ones."
True. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
