* Naoya Anzai (anzai-na...@mxu.nes.nec.co.jp) wrote: > I've found a memory-leak bug in PostgreSQL 9.1.9's background > writer process.
This looks legit, but probably not the right approach to fixing it.
Looks like it'd be better to work out a way to use a static variable to
reuse the same memory, ala what GetRunningTransactionData() does, and
avoid having to do allocation while holding all the locks (or at least,
not very often).
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
