> Hi, > > Thank you for your soon reply. > > I'm trying to set the network timeout related parameters to terminate it. > > # i've tried to set postgresql.conf's tcp_keepalives_* but not success. > > Regards, > > 2013/04/10 14:05、Amit Kapila <amit.kap...@huawei.com> のメッセージ: > >> On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 9:35 AM Dang Minh Huong wrote: >>> Hi, >> >>> I'm wondering if this is a bug of PostgreSQL. >> >>> PostgreSQL's show that replication_timeout parameter can "Terminate >>> replication connections that are inactive longer than the specified number >>> of milliseconds". But in my environment the sender process > is hang up (in >>> several tens of minunites) if i turn off (by power off) Standby PC while >>> pg_basebackup is excuting. >> >>> Is this correct? >> >>> As my debug, sender process is terminated when recieve SIGPIPE process but >>> it come too slow (about 30minutes after standby PC was down). >> >> For such scenario's, new parameter wal_sender_timeout has been introduced in >> 9.3. Refer below: >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/runtime-config-replication.html#RUNTIME-CONFIG-REPLICATION-SENDER >> >> I am not sure how to get rid of this problem in 9.1.9 >> >> With Regards, >> Amit Kapila. >>
-- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
