On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > I have to admit, I find it a bit confusing that so many people report a > bug and then immediately destroy all evidence of the bug. Just seems to > a happen a bit too frequently.
You see, businesses usually need it up ASAP again. Sorry, I must have note down the output of pg_controldata straight after it got broken, I just have not came up to it. > Thats not a pg_controldata output from the broken replica though, or is > it? I guess its from a new standby? That was the output from the standby that was rsync-ed on top of the broken one. I thought you might find something useful in it. Can I test your guess some other way? And what was the guess? -- Kind regards, Sergey Konoplev Database and Software Consultant Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/grayhemp Phone: USA +1 (415) 867-9984, Russia +7 (901) 903-0499, +7 (988) 888-1979 Skype: gray-hemp Jabber: gray...@gmail.com -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
