Ok, I will try. I apologize, I made a mistake in the original post: 'J. P. Bickella' returns the correct array and 'J. P. Bickell' returns NULL. That's what you get for posting in a hurry!
This is the first time I have run this query, so I don't know if it affects previous versions. ~Tom On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:38 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > t...@tomforb.es writes: >> I have two queries: >> http://pgsql.privatepaste.com/7d1473defa >> http://pgsql.privatepaste.com/85e1d43b7a > >> The first query returns NULL and the second one returns an int[] with 623 >> elements in it. The only difference between the two queries is the last >> string - 'J. P. Bickella' returns NULL and 'J. P. Bickell' returns an >> int[]. > > That's ... bizarre. I assume you were running this same query without > issues on earlier PG versions? Which? > >> If needed I can host the database this query is executing on for people to >> download upon request, but it is 1.2gb in size. > > I suspect that you could reproduce the problem with a much smaller > extract from the table, perhaps a couple thousand rows. Please try > to create a self-contained test case along those lines --- it'll be > easier all around than dealing with 1GB of data. > > regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
