On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> wrote: > This bug seems particularly troublesome because the right fix would be > to include the relpersistence in the WAL records that need it. But that > can't be backported (right?).
No, because if a WAL record was written at all, then by definition the table is RELPERSISTENCE_PERMANENT. So there's probably a localized fix. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
