Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Putting this kind of change this late in the 9.2 release process makes
> me a bit nervous, but I don't see a simpler way to solve the problem.
This is a pre-existing bug, not something new in 9.2, and quite honestly
I don't think we should try to fix it under time pressure if there is
any doubt about how to do so. I don't like the proposed patch very
much either, so let's think about it some more.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
