On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 01:47:04PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Euler Taveira de Oliveira <eu...@timbira.com> writes: > > I don't see it as a bug but a limitation. Why do you need such a long > > password? > > Yeah, I think the reason we're not too consistent about this is that > nobody ever imagined that limits of 100 bytes or more would pose an > issue in practice. What's the use-case for passwords longer than > that?
Thanks for all the feedback. I know it is a pain for me to re-ask these questions, but it allows us to know that these issues have gotten sufficient thought. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
