On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 04:46:50PM -0500, David Schnur wrote: > I finally had time to test this further on a variety of systems, and was > unable > to reproduce on any non-Windows platform. The dump even works fine on Windows > XP; just not Windows 7. > > This prompted me to do a little more research, and this time I found this > thread from Sept. 2011: > > http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/ > BUG-6233-pg-dump-hangs-with-Access-Violation-C0000005-td4851598.html > > From Tom Lane in the above thread: > > > Hmm. I can see how that would happen if you're using one of the Windows > environments wherein malloc's done inside libpq have to be free'd inside > libpq. (The PQExpBuffer support code is in libpq...) > > > > However, the flaw in that explanation is that it would basically mean > pg_dump doesn't work at all on Windows, at least not if you have any > user-defined functions, and probably some other cases too because there > seem to be multiple instances of the dubious coding. It's a bit hard to > believe that nobody's noticed that before. > > > This appears to describe exactly the issue I'm encountering, and my build is > in > fact linked against the static runtime. I guess the reason this hasn't come > up > sooner is because most Windows users either use the 'official' binaries rather > than compiling from source, or link against the dynamic runtime. > > Is this something I could expect to be fixed in the near future, or is it > enough of an edge case that I should come up with some solution or work-around > on my own? Thanks,
Late reply, but I don't see any way we could fix this easily. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
