On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 05:41:05PM -0700, Mike Wilson wrote: > Given the stack trace previously supplied and that the pg_upgrade from 9.1.4 > does actually complete successfully can you recommend how I might continue to > diagnose the issue myself? Since the 9.1.4 version of pg_upgrade did work > I've > started to look at the source for pg_upgrade in an attempt to see if the 9.1.4 > version of the tool could be used instead of the 9.2.0 version. Due to the # > of > differences in the pg_upgrade source though a port seems unlikely. > > Can I get the git version string of the PG source you used for the version of > the source that you tested with? I'd like to make sure that I'm using the > same > version as your successful test. Thanks.
I am using git head for testing. Tom sees a few things odd in load_directory() that might be causing some problems on Solaris, and this is new code for 9.2 for Solaris, so that might explain it. I think we need Tom to finish and then if you can grab our git source and test that, it would be great! -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
