On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > Should this be back-patched? (Problem first reported in PG 9.1 due to > the removal of a backward-compatibility symlink.) I am not sure we have > had enough problem reports to warrant it (3 reports).
We back-patch a lot of things based on a single report. Three is a lot. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
