On 11 May 2012 11:07, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> I wonder if we should reserve a few of the lwlock "slots" for critical > sections, to make this less likely to happen. Not only in this case, but in > general. We haven't seen this problem often, but it would be quite trivial > to reserve a few slots. Why reserve them solely for critical sections? What is the downside from having >100 slots for general use. ISTM we should have 250 slots and log a warning if we ever hit 50 or more. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
