Hi I have a Postgresql 9.1.2 installed on a Windows 7 machine and noticed the following thing:
- I start the postgresql by windows service ( on default port ) - when I run pg_ctl -D on the same data directory the response is "no server running" even the server is in fact running already - if I try to start using pg_ctl start ... I receive the error that the port is occupied ( correct ) - if I try to start it on a diffrent port.. the start is succesful and I'm able to run two servers on same data via two diffrent ports. I've connected to them and modified diffrent things in the two databases :) and the databases behived like diffrent ones until the next restart of both servers when inserted data has mixed and messed up ( partially was lost / partially mixed up) Anyway.. back to the original issue it seems not ok from my point of view that pg_ctl seems not to be aware of the postgres instance started by the windows service. I've tried also to first start server from pg_ctl and then from service.. and the service tried to start and then aborted leaving the current server to run alone (correct) I've noticed also that the windows service is creating the pid file but the pg_ctl seems to ignore it on status commands and overwrite it on start commands. On the other hand I've performed several tests (starting , stoping ,status servers on same datadir) only with pg_ctl and all seems to work correctly. Am I missing something or just find a bug? Lucian -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
