The following bug has been logged on the website: Bug reference: 6428 Logged by: Keith Email address: ke...@omniti.com PostgreSQL version: 9.1.2 Operating system: Any Description:
Working on a tool that iterates through the pg_restore -l list for doing more advanced dump filtering (pg_extractor), I came across an inconsistency in the object list that is generated. If a function is declared with the argument variable names defined in the argument list, and has an associated comment, the line for the comment in the pg_restore -l list includes the variable name in the argument list whereas the line for the function itself just has the argument types. This has made it hard for me to match comments with functions. It just seems very inconsistent as well since the function signature does not require the argument variable names to uniquely identify it. Not a hugely critical item, but it's made it hard for me to make my filtering tool as useful as I'd like it to be. Example: 14663; 1255 16507 FUNCTION keith do_something(integer, text) postgres 48818; 0 0 COMMENT keith FUNCTION do_something(data_source_id integer, query text) postgres -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
