On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 9:58 AM, <koizumi...@minos.ocn.ne.jp> wrote:

> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference:      6384
> Logged by:          KOIZUMI Satoru
> Email address:      koizumi...@minos.ocn.ne.jp
> PostgreSQL version: 9.1.2
> Operating system:   Mac OS X
> Description:
>
> The sentence "The program has to include pg_types_date.h, declare a host
> variable as the date type and convert a DATE value into a text form using
> PGTYPESdate_to_asc() function." is in "33.4.4.2.1. timestamp, date".
> But "pg_types_date.h" does not exist. It should be "pgtypes_date.h"
>
>
>
patch attached... is this ok?
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ecpg.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ecpg.sgml
index 68833ca..dedd886 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/ecpg.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/ecpg.sgml
@@ -1043,7 +1043,7 @@ ts = 2010-06-27 18:03:56.949343
 
      <para>
       In addition, the DATE type can be handled in the same way. The
-      program has to include <filename>pg_types_date.h</filename>, declare a host variable
+      program has to include <filename>pgtypes_date.h</filename>, declare a host variable
       as the date type and convert a DATE value into a text form using
       <function>PGTYPESdate_to_asc()</function> function. For more details about the
       pgtypes library functions, see <xref linkend="ecpg-pgtypes">.
-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Reply via email to