Hello,

if you build postgresql (tested all releases from 8.4 up to trunk) for
ARM with the -mthumb instruction set (much better performance), it
fails with

gcc -g -O2 -g -Wall -O2 -fPIC -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith 
-Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wendif-labels -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -g 
-I../../../../src/include -D_GNU_SOURCE -I/usr/include/libxml2 
-I/usr/include/tcl8.5 -c -o xlog.o xlog.c
/tmp/cc8Wkglp.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/cc8Wkglp.s:1456: Error: selected processor does not support `swpb 
r3,r3,[r0]'
/tmp/cc8Wkglp.s:1587: Error: selected processor does not support `swpb 
r2,r2,[r0]'

A fair while ago, Alexander Sack from Linaro applied a patch to our
packages to drop the Assembler bits and instead use gcc's atomic
builtins [1], which provide a proper implementation for thumb, too.

The original patch spectacularly failed on our slightly newer Panda
boards (our old builders were Freescale Babbage boards), but I got
that to work yesterday. Now it's working on Babbage, Panda, both with
and without hard float (armhf) enabled.

I'm not sure how appropriate it is for upstream to have GCC-isms in
the code, but even if it can't land upstream, perhaps it is useful for
other porters/packagers.

Thanks,

Martin

[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.1.2/gcc/Atomic-Builtins.html
-- 
Martin Pitt                        | http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com)  | Debian Developer  (www.debian.org)
Description: use gcc intrinsics rather than assembler to implement tas
Author: Alexander Sack <a...@ubuntu.com>
Author: Martin Pitt <martin.p...@ubuntu.com>
Bug-Ubuntu: https://launchpad.net/bugs/497331
Bug-Ubuntu: https://launchpad.net/bugs/904828

Index: postgresql-9.1-9.1.2/src/include/storage/s_lock.h
===================================================================
--- postgresql-9.1-9.1.2.orig/src/include/storage/s_lock.h	2011-12-01 22:47:20.000000000 +0100
+++ postgresql-9.1-9.1.2/src/include/storage/s_lock.h	2011-12-15 21:17:32.965569760 +0100
@@ -255,21 +255,15 @@
 #if defined(__arm__) || defined(__arm)
 #define HAS_TEST_AND_SET
 
-typedef unsigned char slock_t;
+typedef unsigned int slock_t;
 
 #define TAS(lock) tas(lock)
+#define S_UNLOCK(lock) __sync_lock_release(lock)
 
 static __inline__ int
 tas(volatile slock_t *lock)
 {
-	register slock_t _res = 1;
-
-	__asm__ __volatile__(
-		"	swpb 	%0, %0, [%2]	\n"
-:		"+r"(_res), "+m"(*lock)
-:		"r"(lock)
-:		"memory");
-	return (int) _res;
+	return __sync_lock_test_and_set (lock, 1);
 }
 
 #endif	 /* __arm__ */

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to