On 13/12/11 08:43, Tom Lane wrote: > Craig Ringer <[email protected]> writes: >> because AFAIK there's no ARM asm code or ARM gcc intrinsics hidden away >> in Pg, and that'd be the only other way to get those kinds of errors. > No, you're mistaken about that: we do have inline assembly code in > s_lock.h, and this message does look to be complaining about that code, > because "swpb %0, %0, [%2]" is exactly what the TAS() macro generates > for ARM. Ah - my mistake, and thanks for the correction. I really should've seen that.
-- Craig Ringer -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
