On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Maxim Boguk <maxim.bo...@gmail.com> writes: > >> I know GIST on intarray[] do not have that problem. > >> Very likely the problem is limited to intarray[] GIN indexes only > >> (but I going to test some other not-well known GIN indexes tomorrow). > > > >> Broken FTS indexes on Hot Standby should be known years before. > > > > You might think that, but you'd be wrong :-(. > > Yes, that did sound ominous. > > > ginRedoUpdateMetapage > > is failing to restore the contents of the pending-list correctly, > > which means this is broken for all types of GIN indexes. Will fix. > > Great detective work Tom as ever, much appreciated. > > Thank you very much. Is that fix will be included to the next minor versions releases? (especially into 9.1.2)? -- Maxim Boguk Senior Postgresql DBA.
