Anyway... Thanks to all of you for answering my puzzles, even though none of you gave feasible answer ...
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 00:42, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > Robert Young wrote: >> The answer is simple. >> You said, just the stats collector have some trouble. >> Then I say, I just want to fix the stats collector. >> You said, other things are OK. >> Then I say, I never want to fix other things. >> >> I just plead with you to fix the very thing that you admit not >> functional properly. >> The whole database is almost functional, we won't fix the whole. >> Component of it get in trouble, we fix the component. >> The whole is almost functional can NOT be a reason that we should not >> fix the nonfunctional component. > > You are free to distribute your own version of Postgres that does > whatever you think is best. Our community has given ample thought to > your ideas and has rejected them. > > -- > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us > EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com > > + It's impossible for everything to be true. + > -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
