You got no knowledge about "client applications". What you said is your assumption. Without knowledge, you should consider them equivalent. PG got no priority.
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 16:03, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > On 28.10.2011 18:40, Robert Young wrote: >> >> Which wrong? >> 1.I got no money to buy a good machine to run both the services and >> database. >> 2.I got no money to buy a good machine to run both the services and >> client applications. >> 3.Client applications hard-coding "localhost". >> 4.PG hard-coding "localhost". > > #3. Fix the applications to not hard-code "localhost". The difference > between #3 and #4 is that PostgreSQL really genuinely always does mean to > connect to the local host, while #3 actually wants to connect to some other > host, but it was not made configurable. > > -- > Heikki Linnakangas > EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com > -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
