2011/10/20 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > Valentine Gogichashvili <val...@gmail.com> writes: >> And, ernestly, if it were useless to have SELECT without INTO in plpgsql, >> there also would be no PERFORM command in plpgsql... > > Precisely. Pavel's claim is nonsense. The only real question is how > useful is it to call it PERFORM instead of SELECT.
I didn't design a PERFORM statement. There is two views - somebody from sybase's family know so SELECT without into is forwarded to client. This functionality is missing on Oracle's family. Is true so PERFORM statement is strange, but maybe it's open door for sybase's functionality that was not implemented ever. Regards Pavel Stehule > > regards, tom lane > -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
