On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Sandro Santilli <s...@keybit.net> wrote: > Trying to exclude items from dumps of postgis-enabled databases > we use pg_restore -l output and strip what we think belong to PostGIS. > > In doing so, Renzo found that for OPERATOR there are not enough > informations to unambiguosly find it being part of PostGIS (see > included mail snippet). > > Do you think this could be improved on the pg_restore side ?
In 9.1, we've added the concept of EXTENSIONs. I'm not sure whether PostGIS is planning to take advantage of this mechanism, but it's designed to solve exactly this problem. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
