On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Alvaro Herrera >> <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote: >>> I assume it's not in unreserved_keyword because it would cause a >>> shift/reduce conflict elsewhere. > >> Yeah. In particular, it conflicts with the ancient copy syntax which >> we still support for backwards compatibility with versions < 7.3. We >> can fix the immediate problem with something like the attached. > >> (a) Should we do that? > > That seems like a horrid crock ...
Do you have something else to propose? It's a crock we have used elsewhere, so there is some precedent. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
