Dewin <thisgenericn...@gmail.com> writes:
>> But if that theory is correct, this isn't a new
>> problem in 9.1, it goes back to 8.3.  Have you been running this script
>> successfully on older versions?

> On 9.0.

Thanks.  On reflection I concluded that this is a new bug in 9.1 --- or
at least, this manifestation is new in 9.1.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-04/msg00970.php

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Reply via email to