Dewin <thisgenericn...@gmail.com> writes: >> But if that theory is correct, this isn't a new >> problem in 9.1, it goes back to 8.3. Have you been running this script >> successfully on older versions?
> On 9.0. Thanks. On reflection I concluded that this is a new bug in 9.1 --- or at least, this manifestation is new in 9.1. http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-04/msg00970.php regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs