I wrote:
> Per-Olov Esgard <per-olov.esg...@micronic-mydata.com> writes:
>> The third extracted buffer is not ok but interpreted as ok with id 10:
>> 10."boolean", mydbcomndata_10."boolean", mydbcomndata_10."boolean",
>> mydbcomndata_10."boolean", mydbcomndata_10."boolean", character varying,
>> mydbcomndata_10."integer", mydbcomndata_10.componentname,
>> mydbcomndata_10."integer", mydbcomndata_10."integer",
>> mydbcomndata_10."integer", mydbcomndata_10.angle,
>> mydbcomndata_10."boolean", mydbcomndata_10."boolean",
>> mydbcomndata_10."boolean", mydbcomndata_10."boolean",
>> mydbcomndata_10."boolean", mydbcomndata_10."boolean",
>> mydbcomndata_10."boolean") postgres
>> So as you can see, the last part of my schema name consists of a number
>> that is interpreted as an id.
> Ah, I see. So what we probably need to do for a real fix is to teach
> that code to distinguish continuation lines from normal ones.
Fix committed --- thanks for the report!
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
