Tom Lane wrote:
> "Stuart Bishop" <stu...@stuartbishop.net> writes:
> > "pg_restore --clean" appears to have an ordering problem, where a custom
> > type is being dropped before some functions that use that custom type as a
> > parameter, which fails.
>
> It's always worked that way, and is difficult to avoid because of the
> circular dependencies between a type and its I/O functions. If we were
> to suppress the DROP FUNCTION commands for the I/O functions, we could
> have a non-cosmetic failure: suppose the functions have been created
> in the target DB, but not the type itself? Then the DROP TYPE CASCADE
> wouldn't remove the functions, and we'd have a conflict when the script
> tries to create them again.
>
> I don't think anyone's ever felt that it was essential for --clean to
> not produce any "no such object" errors, since in general you'd get some
> of those anyway unless the target DB exactly matches the source. Maybe
> an appropriate response is to document that this is expected.
Applied doc patch attached.
--
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/pg_dump.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/pg_dump.sgml
index e78d275..7f12460 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/pg_dump.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/pg_dump.sgml
@@ -142,7 +142,8 @@ PostgreSQL documentation
<listitem>
<para>
Output commands to clean (drop)
- database objects prior to (the commands for) creating them.
+ database objects prior to outputing the commands for creating them.
+ (Restore might generate some harmless errors.)
</para>
<para>
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
