This is currently a TODO so at least we are tracking it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
andreas wrote: > On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 18:22 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > >> Well, actually the btree_gist implementation for inet is a completely > > >> broken piece of junk: it thinks that convert_network_to_scalar is 100% > > >> trustworthy and can be used as a substitute for the real comparison > > >> functions, which isn't even approximately true. > > > > > Are you planning to fix this? > > > > No. I don't understand why Teodor did it like that, so I'm not going > > to try to change it. I'd be willing to take responsibility for ripping > > out btree_gist's inet support altogether ... > > > > regards, tom lane > > That is the reason why I just reported it instead of trying to fix it > myself first. Since I could not understand why it was done like that, I > did not feel like fixing it. > > Best regards, > Andreas Karlsson > > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
