Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes:
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 18:31, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Hmm. I think that not resetting the n_tuples_xxx fields was simply an
>> oversight in Magnus' patch that added them,
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-03/msg00144.php
>> Magnus, was this intentional by any chance?
> Nope, not that I can recall. Looks like an oversight.
OK, applied, along with the last_autovac_time reset --- I concluded that
keeping that at the database level wouldn't be consistent, since we're
throwing it away at the table level.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
