Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
>> On Sunday 05 December 2010 13:07:23 Martin Atukunda wrote:
>>>> so, basically, the only way out of this would be to:
I think the reason the given example fails is just that it's all being
done in one transaction. If the null-containing row were known dead
it wouldn't get indexed. So: commit.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
