Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
> Tom Lane escreveu:
> > "thommy" <der.tho...@gmx.net> writes:
> >> I just came across a small inconsistency:
> >
> >> pg=# select enumvals from pg_settings where name='client_min_messages';
> >> enumvals
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> >> {debug5,debug4,debug3,debug2,debug1,log,notice,warning,error}
> >
> > It's intentional that PANIC isn't listed there (nor is FATAL),
> > on the grounds that it's not really a useful setting.
> >
> Fine. But shouldn't we remove these options from docs and/or code?
We are basically reusing the same validation code for this and other
min_messages settings. Is it worth creating a custom one just for
client_min_messages? Probably not.
--
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
