On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:34:16PM -0400, Mladen Gogala wrote: > Jeff Davis wrote: > >On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 16:53 -0400, Mladen Gogala wrote: > >>Jeff, that's the problem. Functions like "MAX" are rather ordinary > >>and frequently used. > > > >I agree that it could be improved. The best way to move such > >improvement forward is to advance the discussion on -hackers. Start > >with this thread here: > > > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-07/msg01115.php > > > >and see if you have anything to add, or see if you can find related > >discussions. The main point is that -bugs is usually for short > >discussions about fixing defects that were just discovered, and > >-hackers is better for problems without an obvious solution, where > >discussion is required. > > > Thanks, I will do that. However, I cannot call myself a hacker, I > am but a mere beginner with Postgres.
You're a hacker when you start hacking :) Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
