Excerpts from Euler Taveira de Oliveira's message of mié sep 01 10:18:10 -0400 2010: > Tom Lane escreveu: > > I'm not inclined to go and retroactively document that these spellings > > are possible but deprecated in the old branches. I think that would > > just confuse matters even more. > > Is it worth preventing that sloppy implementation in the old branches?
That risks removing a (mis)feature that people are currently depending on. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
