Greg Stark <gsst...@mit.edu> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> What we are doing here, IMO, is not just changing string_agg() but
>> instituting a project policy that we are not going to offer built-in
>> aggregates with the same names and different numbers of arguments ---
>> otherwise the problem will come right back.
> Well I think this can be a pretty soft policy.
Sure, we could break it given good cause. What I intend with the
opr_sanity test is just that people won't be able to put something
in without being reminded of this consideration.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
