On 8/3/2010 4:08 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
However, most of the cases that seem of interest so far are in fairly
small, stable functions.  Would it be reasonable to attach a "checked
for overflow problems" label to these functions as a whole?

This should work great.  I'll get my clang hacker to start working on it.

I see that pgsql has support already in place to def out attributes when non-GCC ocmpilers are used.

Just to be clear we're talking about putting something like this in your header files:

int
bms_first_member(Bitmapset *a)
__attribute__((no_integer_overflow_checks));

Pick whatever name you like for this attribute, it doesn't matter to us.

John

--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Reply via email to