Hi, On Monday 19 July 2010 19:57:13 Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Excerpts from Andres Freund's message of lun jul 19 11:58:06 -0400 2010: > > On Monday 19 July 2010 17:26:25 Hans van Kranenburg wrote: > > > When issuing an update statement in a transaction with ~30800 levels of > > > savepoint nesting, (which is insane, but possible), postgresql > > > segfaults due to a stack overflow in the AssignTransactionId function, > > > which recursively assign transaction ids to parent transactions. > > > > It seems easy enough to throw a check_stack_depth() in there - survives > > make check here. > > I wonder if it would work to deal with the problem non-recursively > instead. We don't impose subxact depth restrictions elsewhere, why > start now? It looks trivial enough, but whats the point?
Andres -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
