Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> On 10/06/10 16:21, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I do agree that the human readability of pg_dump is an asset in many
>> situations - I have often dumped out the DDL for particular objects
>> just to look at it, for example. However, I emphatically do NOT agree
>> that leaving someone with a 500MB dump file (or, for some people on
>> this list, a whole heck of a lot larger than that) that has to be
>> manually edited to reload is a useful behavior. It's a huge pain in
>> the neck.
> Much easier to do a schema-only dump, edit that, and dump data separately.
That gets you out of the huge-file-to-edit problem, but the performance
costs of restoring a separate-data dump are a pretty serious
disadvantage. We really should do something about that.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
