On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Why not? Surely we can restrict EXPLAIN's set of key names to be safe. > >> It seems to me that it would be easy for a future patch to break this >> by accident. > > Really? What likely key names would be in need of quoting? I can't > imagine accepting a field name that contains punctuation or leading > or trailing whitespace, for example.
It seemed to me, in particular, that someone might use a # symbol, like "# of Iterations". Maybe I'm being paranoid. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
