Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of vie may 14 13:26:06 -0400 2010: > However, I think -C is a special case because it's quite un-obvious > to the user that it effectively acts as a filter switch --- in fact a > de-filtering switch, because the lack of -C is what filters out the > DATABASE item. > > I'm inclined to think that we should document that the output of -l > is restricted by -n and similar switches, but change the code so that > -C doesn't affect -l output. Comments?
+1 -- -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
