Mario Splivalo <[email protected]> writes: > Huh! As I was explained od pg-sql list by Tom Lane, this should not > happen, so it is a bug! :) I apologize for the inconvenience.
It's already fixed: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2010-04/msg00126.php regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
