> It's also my 3rd choice of solution behind fine-grained lock conflicts
> (1st) which would avoid many issues and master/standby in lock step
> (2nd).

Yeah, I just can't imagine you hunting down all of the corner cases for
fine-grained lock conflicts in time for 9.0.  Given what I've been
looking at, it seems like a LOT of work.

--Josh Berkus

-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Reply via email to