> It's also my 3rd choice of solution behind fine-grained lock conflicts > (1st) which would avoid many issues and master/standby in lock step > (2nd).
Yeah, I just can't imagine you hunting down all of the corner cases for fine-grained lock conflicts in time for 9.0. Given what I've been looking at, it seems like a LOT of work. --Josh Berkus -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
