Up! Anybody will answer about the patch? On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Oleg Serov <sero...@gmail.com> wrote:
> How about adding this patch to postgresql it will slove the problem? > > On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Greg Stark<gsst...@mit.edu> wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Tom Lane<t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> when i done dump->restore i > >>> have surprise, > >>> Column ordering was changed. > >> > >> This is not a bug, it's the intended behavior. > > > > I thought that was a bug, just one that was too hard to fix for the > > problems it caused. It might be more fixable if we get around to the > > work that was discussed earlier where we separate attnum into three > > different values. > > > > Oleg: note that having the columns in the same position allows some > > optimizations in the executor so it's probably a good thing if it > > hasn't broken your application. > > > > -- > > greg > > http://mit.edu/~gsstark/resume.pdf<http://mit.edu/%7Egsstark/resume.pdf> > > > -- С уважением Олег Серов
