On Feb 24, 2010, at 7:19 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> ISTM the easiest and safest fix would be to not allow recursive plperl >> creations. You could still call plperl functions within functions, >> just not if they are not defined. This limitation really blows > > That's the understatement of the month. What you're saying, IIUC, is > that if function A calls function B via a SPI command, and B wasn't > executed previously in the current session, it would fail? Seems > entirely unacceptable.
Exactly what I was thinking. This "fix" is right out. Best, David -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
