On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 04:31:05PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alex Hunsaker <bada...@gmail.com> writes:
> > How about something like the below?
>
> I still think that this is optimizing the wrong thing. We care about
> the clarity of the message the user sees, not about how short or clean
> the Perl code is. I'm inclined to stay with the same basic
> implementation and just hack up the regexp some more to cope with 5.11's
> more verbose -v output.
There's no need to try to parse the perl -v output, which is intended
for humans and may change in future. Using
perl -e 'print $]'
will give you the version number in floating point format for all
versions of perl. For perl5 the format is 5.xxxyyy so testing
for >= 5.008 (or ideally 5.008001) will work fine.
Tim.
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
